Recent years have been a true test of the effectiveness of local leadership, from public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic to higher-than-average inflation and other issues like elevated homicide rates. Even during less difficult times, running a city is a tall order. The larger the city, the more complex it becomes to manage. Local leaders must balance the public’s diverse interests with the city’s limited resources. Leaders must carefully consider which services are most essential, which agencies’ budgets to cut or boost, and how much to charge in local taxes, among other decisions. But how do we measure the effectiveness of local leadership and how do we determine the best and worst-run cities in Arizona and the U.S.?


LOCAL NEWS: 100 best places to work and live in Arizona for 2025

INDUSTRY INSIGHTS: Want more news like this? Get our free newsletter here


One way is by determining a city’s operating efficiency. In other words, we can learn how well city officials manage and spend public funds by comparing the quality of the services residents receive against the city’s total budget. Using that approach, WalletHub compared the operating efficiency of 148 of the largest U.S. cities to reveal which among them are managed best. We constructed a “Quality of Services” score made up of 36 metrics grouped into six service categories, which we then measured against the city’s per-capita budget.

“The best-run cities in America use their budgets most effectively to provide high-quality financial security, education, health, safety and transportation to their residents,” says Cassandra Happe, Wallethub analyst. “Many of the top cities also have a very low amount of outstanding government debt per capita, which can prevent financial troubles in the future.”

Main Findings

Source: WalletHub

The best-run cities in Arizona

No. 1. Mesa

WalletHub rank: #26 of 149

Quality of city services rank: 39

Financial stability rank: 59

Education rank: 48

Health rank: 64

Safety rank: 37

Economy rank: 7

Infrastructure and pollution rank: 142

No. 2. Tucson

WalletHub rank: #30 of 149

Quality of city services rank: 95

Financial stability rank: 90

Education rank: 101

Health rank: 69

Safety rank: 119

Economy rank: 45

Infrastructure and pollution rank: 99

No. 3. Phoenix

WalletHub rank: #40 of 149

Quality of city services rank: 46

Financial stability rank: 35

Education rank: 93

Health rank: 61

Safety rank: 104

Economy rank: 5

Infrastructure and pollution rank: 67

Best-Run Cities in America

Overall Rank* CityQuality of City Services Rank Total Budget per Capita Rank 
1Nampa, ID451
2Lexington-Fayette, KY412
3Boise, ID44
4Nashua, NH313
5Oklahoma City, OK586
6Durham, NC1620
7Provo, UT629
8Fort Wayne, IN4911
9Sioux Falls, SD2916
10Wichita, KS985
11Raleigh, NC1233
12Columbus, GA838
13Warwick, RI3719
14Las Cruces, NM857
15Missoula, MT5915
16Billings, MT879
17Huntington, WV10510
18Manchester, NH3827
19Bismarck, ND2535
20Baton Rouge, LA1393
21Madison, WI1441
22Virginia Beach, VA153
23Grand Rapids, MI3331
24Lincoln, NE2734
25Mesa, AZ5128
26Rapid City, SD11512
27Greensboro, NC7023
28Aurora, IL3240
29Tulsa, OK8125
30Warren, MI6930
31Tucson, AZ11217
32Chesapeake, VA861
33Phoenix, AZ5538
34Topeka, KS10924
35Cedar Rapids, IA4742
36St. Petersburg, FL3650
37Albuquerque, NM11922
38Worcester, MA2857
39Reno, NV5248
40Lewiston, ME9337
41Salem, OR4655
42Jacksonville, FL6845
43Mobile, AL9439
44Corpus Christi, TX8643
45Portland, ME1080
46Colorado Springs, CO6154
47Las Vegas, NV3566
48El Paso, TX4261
49Fort Worth, TX8046
50Arlington, TX4860
51Columbia, SC4467
52Little Rock, AR12332
53Charleston, SC791
54Bridgeport, CT9147
55Eugene, OR3473
56Louisville, KY10449
57Casper, WY9051
58Hialeah, FL1888
59Fargo, ND6464
60Providence, RI9552
61Frederick, MD5100
62Miami, FL1593
63Montgomery, AL12636
64Toledo, OH14121
65Huntington Beach, CA2110
66Tallahassee, FL6571
67Boston, MA9103
68Dover, DE8269
69Aurora, CO8965
70Spokane, WA6674
71Garland, TX6079
72Omaha, NE5083
73Columbus, OH7376
74Springfield, MA10868
75Anchorage, AK8872
76Fort Smith, AR13544
77Fairbanks, AK12056
78Shreveport, LA14326
79San Diego, CA13116
80Des Moines, IA6786
81Portland, OR22111
82Tampa, FL20114
83Gary, IN14618
84Santa Ana, CA4399
85Houston, TX10275
86Rutland, VT12263
87Orlando, FL21115
88Akron, OH9282
89Austin, TX11122
90St. Paul, MN56102
91Jackson, MS14714
92Milwaukee, WI13358
93Indianapolis, IN11178
94San Antonio, TX63101
95Richmond, VA10190
96Minneapolis, MN54112
97Dallas, TX10795
98Norfolk, VA12185
99Cincinnati, OH10698
100Fremont, CA19128
101Burlington, VT71113
102Atlanta, GA62117
103Dayton, OH11889
104Anaheim, CA78109
105Lubbock, TX97106
106Wilmington, DE99105
107Charleston, WV13281
108Birmingham, AL12984
109Buffalo, NY76119
110Bakersfield, CA12592
111San Jose, CA23134
112Syracuse, NY84120
113Charlotte, NC26135
114Pittsburgh, PA40132
115Kansas City, MO12794
116Modesto, CA96121
117New Haven, CT12896
118Knoxville, TN72125
119Stockton, CA13787
120New Orleans, LA14077
121Fort Lauderdale, FL53131
122St. Louis, MO14559
123Seattle, WA17140
124Nashville, TN117118
125Cheyenne, WY77126
126Baltimore, MD130108
127Rochester, NY75129
128Hartford, CT136104
129Fresno, CA114123
130Salt Lake City, UT39141
131Kansas City, KS138107
132Yonkers, NY31142
133Riverside, CA110133
134Memphis, TN14297
135Long Beach, CA74139
136Sacramento, CA100137
137Chicago, IL131124
138Philadelphia, PA124130
139Los Angeles, CA57144
140Detroit, MI14870
141Denver, CO79143
142Tacoma, WA113138
143Cleveland, OH134136
144Flint, MI144127
145New York, NY30147
146Gulfport, MS116145
147Oakland, CA103146
148San Francisco, CA24148
Notes: *No. 1 = Best-Run. The columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the highest quality of city services, and the smallest budget per capita, respectively.

Detailed breakdown of the best-run cities

Quality of City Services*
(Score)
 
CityFinancial Stability Rank Education Rank Health Rank Safety Rank Economy Rank Infrastructure & Pollution Rank 
1
(69.02)
Virginia Beach, VA93607995
2
(68.29)
Huntington Beach, CA76110124048
3
(67.29)
Nashua, NH19394112143
4
(66.22)
Boise, ID4444222193
5
(65.23)
Frederick, MD305371410511
6
(65.09)
Provo, UT27243466462
7
(64.89)
Charleston, SC16197230457
8
(64.85)
Chesapeake, VA612621614134
9
(64.01)
Boston, MA31386158928
10
(63.95)
Portland, ME377464966
11
(63.79)
Austin, TX29819751750
12
(63.61)
Raleigh, NC114921441385
13
(63.60)
San Diego, CA86713286036
14
(63.42)
Madison, WI107118187184
15
(63.10)
Miami, FL85427671517
16
(62.30)
Durham, NC411236019138
17
(62.05)
Seattle, WA2010111105322
18
(62.02)
Hialeah, FL1262441010131
19
(61.81)
Fremont, CA117952635101
20
(61.46)
Tampa, FL393065511629
21
(61.20)
Orlando, FL351728108815
22
(60.98)
Portland, OR17616126989
23
(60.88)
San Jose, CA4736242110126
24
(60.79)
San Francisco, CA5215110713312
25
(60.71)
Bismarck, ND239131276179
26
(59.92)
Charlotte, NC1347437712115
27
(59.66)
Lincoln, NE289813546116
28
(59.19)
Worcester, MA926232224465
29
(59.02)
Sioux Falls, SD566045393692
30
(59.00)
New York, NY10332172513126
31
(58.90)
Yonkers, NY133458313047
32
(58.87)
Aurora, IL11420268100121
33
(58.85)
Grand Rapids, MI695852573314
34
(58.78)
Eugene, OR2241894810737
35
(58.22)
Las Vegas, NV838061403824
36
(57.91)
St. Petersburg, FL94686965235
37
(57.83)
Warwick, RI1057978450104
38
(57.65)
Manchester, NH9012435294734
39
(57.50)
Salt Lake City, UT3322241363110
40
(57.49)
Pittsburgh, PA124165443588
41
(57.27)
Lexington-Fayette, KY5852513481127
42
(57.21)
El Paso, TX10213831342109
43
(57.11)
Santa Ana, CA844293195123
44
(56.97)
Columbia, SC4011376552060
45
(56.91)
Nampa, ID8213994518114
46
(56.80)
Salem, OR747230566788
47
(56.68)
Cedar Rapids, IA2892773212591
48
(56.48)
Arlington, TX6533873624144
49
(56.31)
Fort Wayne, IN21701151778133
50
(56.19)
Omaha, NE7565674751100
51
(56.01)
Mesa, AZ619082385140
52
(55.95)
Reno, NV10051463777106
53
(55.80)
Fort Lauderdale, FL415733135754
54
(55.79)
Minneapolis, MN4313525125761
55
(55.71)
Phoenix, AZ32103801021153
56
(55.65)
St. Paul, MN511298682753
57
(55.31)
Los Angeles, CA9540207413273
58
(55.27)
Oklahoma City, OK8841097032135
59
(55.20)
Missoula, MT1202158684880
60
(55.12)
Garland, TX10435752425148
61
(55.07)
Colorado Springs, CO7163746628118
62
(54.59)
Atlanta, GA799385119332
63
(54.46)
San Antonio, TX2454911235272
64
(54.36)
Fargo, ND9811829548845
65
(54.30)
Tallahassee, FL77261276410613
66
(54.26)
Spokane, WA684656967396
67
(54.17)
Des Moines, IA66109427612359
68
(54.09)
Jacksonville, FL7050123812942
69
(53.81)
Warren, MI5911290233056
70
(53.71)
Greensboro, NC53812990104122
71
(53.55)
Burlington, VT961283887227
72
(53.51)
Knoxville, TN38341251184339
73
(53.10)
Columbus, OH63105112507086
74
(52.99)
Long Beach, CA130231462121119
75
(52.72)
Rochester, NY1099571711222
76
(52.62)
Buffalo, NY106100535814023
77
(52.55)
Cheyenne, WY1512195335683
78
(52.55)
Anaheim, CA1391876994124
79
(52.42)
Denver, CO50104391328064
80
(52.39)
Fort Worth, TX10748635249143
81
(52.33)
Tulsa, OK267710812239103
82
(52.26)
Dover, DE878599867441
83
(52.20)
Columbus, GA49561405311466
84
(52.12)
Syracuse, NY11311048491444
85
(52.00)
Las Cruces, NM55817012010278
86
(51.95)
Corpus Christi, TX80281207254136
87
(51.69)
Billings, MT54831169734111
88
(51.46)
Anchorage, AK425588796577
89
(51.43)
Aurora, CO34983611499139
90
(51.35)
Casper, WY1133119198676
91
(51.33)
Bridgeport, CT14099121114761
92
(51.20)
Akron, OH88106103808454
93
(51.12)
Lewiston, ME93146137212244
94
(51.12)
Mobile, AL572713110010938
95
(50.96)
Providence, RI13813638208251
96
(50.96)
Modesto, CA1228897467997
97
(50.90)
Lubbock, TX72149212169141
98
(50.67)
Wichita, KS811071009159110
99
(50.65)
Wilmington, DE73731021131277
100
(50.62)
Sacramento, CA11964479992102
101
(50.45)
Richmond, VA36140135595571
102
(50.44)
Houston, TX112255713166108
103
(50.38)
Oakland, CA6182414313798
104
(50.31)
Louisville, KY4610111310911968
105
(50.10)
Huntington, WV12691306111531
106
(50.02)
Cincinnati, OH97861228712819
107
(49.88)
Dallas, TX132665910627107
108
(49.78)
Springfield, MA125120844113649
109
(49.59)
Topeka, KS99102124836821
110
(49.42)
Riverside, CA12767558537142
111
(48.66)
Indianapolis, IN1412513910383120
112
(48.41)
Tucson, AZ89115731299099
113
(48.29)
Tacoma, WA10176401418752
114
(48.25)
Fresno, CA118537995118137
115
(48.15)
Rapid City, SD601221428941113
116
(48.07)
Gulfport, MS13175987885117
117
(47.98)
Nashville, TN1101171061272390
118
(47.23)
Dayton, OH649711413313530
119
(46.86)
Albuquerque, NM911161111392674
120
(46.43)
Fairbanks, AK18137509811287
121
(46.41)
Norfolk, VA781271489245112
122
(46.21)
Rutland, VT71316611510325
123
(45.97)
Little Rock, AR31941071469769
124
(45.90)
Philadelphia, PA1231411211015758
125
(45.88)
Bakersfield, CA1157811084120147
126
(45.62)
Montgomery, AL1084314211610840
127
(45.36)
Kansas City, MO1165910413891105
128
(45.36)
New Haven, CT143114497313918
129
(44.98)
Birmingham, AL111311171449667
130
(44.96)
Baltimore, MD4814414610512482
131
(44.44)
Chicago, IL14861684512633
132
(44.25)
Charleston, WV135371361176346
133
(43.91)
Milwaukee, WI1371239312410181
134
(43.75)
Cleveland, OH12113210113412989
135
(43.57)
Fort Smith, AR1362912813011363
136
(43.33)
Hartford, CT14710815631465
137
(42.22)
Stockton, CA141969694111146
138
(41.99)
Kansas City, KS1421451051116270
139
(40.11)
Baton Rouge, LA45119134145142132
140
(40.04)
New Orleans, LA12814811814214316
141
(39.92)
Toledo, OH12914313893134125
142
(38.69)
Memphis, TN67126132148117130
143
(37.18)
Shreveport, LA1448714410413894
144
(37.12)
Flint, MI2514214512814175
145
(35.72)
St. Louis, MO1341471471479320
146
(35.05)
Gary, IN53130126112148145
147
(31.57)
Jackson, MS146111133137116128
148
(30.11)
Detroit, MI145134141140145129
Notes: *No. 1 = Best-Run
With the exception of “Quality of City Services” score, all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.