18 strategies for successful vendor and supplier management in technology companies
Effective vendor and supplier management is crucial for technology companies’ success. This article presents practical strategies to optimize these relationships, drawing from the expertise of industry professionals. Learn how to implement key practices that can transform your approach to vendor and supplier partnerships.
LOCAL NEWS: 100 best places to work and live in Arizona for 2025
INDUSTRY INSIGHTS: Want more news like this? Get our free newsletter here
- Create Detailed Vendor Onboarding Plans
- Implement Performance-Driven Vendor Scorecards
- Set Clear Metrics and Communicate Regularly
- Conduct Quarterly Performance and Risk Reviews
- Establish Clear Contracts and Maintain Communication
- Develop Rigorous Vendor Evaluation Process
- Design Systems for Vendor Independence
- Foster Open Communication with Vendors
- Set Outcome-Based Expectations for Vendors
- Treat Vendors as Long-Term Strategic Partners
- Tie Vendor Goals to Business Outcomes
- Design Systems for Easy Vendor Replacement
- Provide Full Context to Vendors
- Build Trust Through Transparency
- Run Shared SLA War Rooms
- Maintain Personal Relationships with Vendors
- Diversify Supplier Base for Redundancy
- Create Internal Abstraction Layers
Create Detailed Vendor Onboarding Plans
One strategy that has worked well for us is creating detailed vendor onboarding plans for every new supplier or contractor. It’s not just a checklist; we treat onboarding like a first project together. The goal is to set expectations, clarify communication channels, and build familiarity with how we work. I recall when we brought in a new cybersecurity compliance vendor to support Elmo Taddeo’s team. That onboarding session revealed gaps in their reporting process early. Addressing them upfront saved us countless hours down the road.
We also believe in regular sync-ups—even if the vendor isn’t actively on a project at the moment. A quick monthly call or shared update keeps the relationship warm and the context fresh. During the pandemic, one of our remote support partners helped us scale quickly for clients shifting to work-from-home. That agility came from months of prior relationship-building. Because they already understood our processes and our standards, they could jump in without a learning curve.
Finally, we evaluate vendors not just on cost or delivery but also on how well they contribute to innovation. Some of our best solutions started with a vendor suggestion. One of our backup system upgrades came after a vendor engineer mentioned a simpler integration during a casual chat. We encourage those conversations. Treating vendors like collaborators instead of outsiders leads to better outcomes and long-term success.
Konrad Martin, CEO, Tech Advisors
Implement Performance-Driven Vendor Scorecards
As someone leading a healthcare IT company, vendor management isn’t just a line item—it’s a key business lever. One strategy that has worked exceptionally well for us is building a performance-driven vendor scorecard system combined with a joint governance approach.
We moved away from a “vendor-as-a-service” mindset to treating them like strategic partners.
Every quarter, we track performance across key metrics—delivery timelines, compliance, support responsiveness, and innovation contributions. Then, we sit down with the vendor and review the data together. There’s no finger-pointing, just shared accountability.
One standout example was with our API integration partner, where early uptime issues threatened our SLAs. By implementing this collaborative review process, we helped them identify and fix inefficiencies in their deployment process. Within a few months, system uptime improved dramatically, and we even co-developed two features that are now part of our live platform.
Why it works:
1. It creates transparency.
2. It builds trust.
3. It aligns performance with business goals.
In fast-moving industries like healthcare tech, this kind of vendor engagement doesn’t just reduce risk—it drives innovation and growth. If you’re relying on external partners to deliver mission-critical services, this strategy might be your smartest move yet.
Riken Shah, Founder & CEO, OSP Labs
Set Clear Metrics and Communicate Regularly
One thing that worked for us was setting clear metrics and talking often with suppliers. Instead of just sending orders and waiting, we started having regular meetings every month or quarter with each key vendor. In these meetings, we explain our plans and listen to their ideas. We also created a simple scorecard. Every few months, we rate things like on-time delivery, product quality, and how easy they are to work with. Then we share those scores with them.
This made a big difference. Suppliers understood exactly what we needed and could address any issues. It also made them feel like partners, not just companies we buy from. This partnership approach with honest feedback and clear goals helped keep projects on track and often led to better deals and innovations.
David Grossman, Founder & Chief Growth Officer, Lessn
Conduct Quarterly Performance and Risk Reviews
One of the most effective strategies we’ve adopted for managing vendors and suppliers is conducting quarterly performance and risk reviews directly tied to our service delivery goals. Rather than treating vendor relationships as purely transactional, we assess each supplier on metrics that align with what matters to our clients—uptime, response times, product roadmap stability, and support quality.
We document and score these metrics, then hold structured quarterly check-ins where we share feedback, raise any concerns, and align on future priorities. This proactive approach has helped us to avoid surprises, strengthen collaboration, and, in several cases, negotiate better terms or early access to features that benefit our clients.
By managing vendor relationships with the same rigor we apply to internal operations, we’ve built a supply chain that’s more resilient, responsive, and aligned with the high standards our clients expect. It has played a key role in maintaining consistent service quality as we’ve scaled.
Craig Bird, Managing Director, CloudTech24
Establish Clear Contracts and Maintain Communication
Clear working conditions are discussed at the start.
If you aim to have good and effective work with suppliers and contractors, it is important to sign a contract before starting work, where all deadlines, prices, and conditions are spelled out. This will make the work much easier later, and in case of misunderstandings, you will have this document.
Communication is the key to success.
Do not ignore the contractor after signing the agreement—communicate and ask about progress in order to solve possible problems in a timely manner.
Also, to understand whether such cooperation suits you and whether you are ready to continue it, evaluate the work of the contractors every week: whether they meet deadlines, what the quality of the work is, and whether they respond quickly to corrections.
Then there will be no chaos at all, and therefore, stable and good work is ensured.
When everything is spelled out in advance, no time is wasted on disputes or clarification of details during the project. The team is focused on the result, not on “solving” situations.
When there is good communication, it saves time when solving problems and saves your money, as you won’t have to redo work later.
Taras Tymoshchuk, CEO, Co-Founder, Geniusee
Develop Rigorous Vendor Evaluation Process
One strategy that has been incredibly effective is having a rigorous vendor evaluation and integration process.
With every potential partner, we assess their performance, security, and scalability before integrating anything into our platform. When we integrated OpenAI’s APIs, for example, we ran multiple reliability and security tests to ensure they met enterprise standards.
But it doesn’t stop at onboarding.
We stay closely connected post-integration to ensure smooth collaboration and ongoing support. That consistency has helped us build a resilient, trusted ecosystem. And it’s one of the reasons we’ve been able to serve clients like Toyota with confidence.
Alexander De Ridder, Co-Founder & CTO, SmythOS.com
Design Systems for Vendor Independence
I’ve already built five companies and worked with dozens of tech founders, and one strategy I’ve found essential for managing vendors is to never give away critical leverage.
I understand that it’s easy to become comfortable when a vendor works well, especially early on. But if you build your core systems around one outside partner without a backup plan, trust me, you’re not scaling but rather gambling. I’ve seen companies lock themselves into exclusive APIs, custom contracts, or tools only one vendor supports, and when that relationship sours or pricing changes, it immediately stalls the entire roadmap.
What’s worked better for us is treating vendors as modular. From day one, we design workflows with the assumption that a vendor might need to be replaced. That means there is clear documentation, clean data handoffs, and fallback options scoped in early.
This sends a message to the vendor that we value the partnership, but we’re not dependent on it.
This mindset has saved us from being cornered more than once. And it keeps negotiations on our part honest, relationships professional, and product velocity intact—even when something breaks.
Jeff Mains, Founder and CEO, Champion Leadership Group
Foster Open Communication with Vendors
Our most effective strategy for managing technology vendors is prioritizing open communication and collaboration over purely cost-driven negotiations.
For critical vendors like Stripe, we assign dedicated representatives who understand the vendor’s roadmap and foster a positive working relationship. We maintain proactive communication and feedback loops, including regular check-ins.
This strategy ensures product stability and innovation while reducing operational risk through collaborative issue mitigation. Ultimately, well-managed vendor relationships enable our internal teams to focus on building core features, directly supporting our mission to empower camp directors.
Andrew Downing, CEO, Camp Network
Set Outcome-Based Expectations for Vendors
I believe that the most effective strategy for managing vendors is setting outcome-based expectations from the start, not just deliverables.
In our company, instead of only defining what needs to be built or delivered, we tie vendor milestones to measurable outcomes—such as performance benchmarks, integration timelines, or support response times. We review these regularly, not just at the end of the contract. This approach keeps both sides aligned and accountable.
For example, when working with a cloud optimization partner, we didn’t just ask for cost savings. We set a goal to reduce latency on test execution by 20 percent. That focus on results pushed the vendor to think deeper and deliver smarter solutions.
This approach builds stronger partnerships, not just transactions. When vendors know they are judged by business impact, not just tasks completed, the quality of work and commitment increases. And that drives real progress.
Vivek Nair, Co-Founder, BotGauge
Treat Vendors as Long-Term Strategic Partners
One strategy that really works is treating vendors like long-term partners, not just service providers.
Setting clear expectations up front—especially around communication frequency, response time, and escalation paths—keeps everyone aligned. But just as important is involving them early in planning, not just at the execution stage. When vendors feel like they’re part of the roadmap, they usually go the extra mile.
It also helps to do quarterly reviews—not just on cost and performance, but also on risks, roadmap alignment, and ways to improve the relationship.
This kind of transparent, two-way approach leads to better accountability, fewer surprises, and stronger support when it really matters.
Vipul Mehta, Co-Founder & CTO, WeblineGlobal
Tie Vendor Goals to Business Outcomes
Vendor management is effective when there’s structure, clarity, and follow-through. One practice I rely on is tying every engagement to clear performance goals with regular check-ins. No one proceeds without a shared understanding of outcomes. It’s not about lengthy contracts or complicated tools. It’s about mutual accountability. Vendors know what they’re being measured on, and we keep the focus on results that matter.
This approach applies across a range of initiatives such as system upgrades, cybersecurity improvements, and platform changes. Instead of reacting to missed deadlines or unclear deliverables, we track performance early and often. It reduces delays, eliminates confusion, and keeps execution on track. When vendors know their success is linked to business outcomes, they shift from task-based work to impact-driven delivery. If performance slips, the next step is immediate and direct: reset or replace.
This structure builds discipline. Vendors perform, or they don’t continue. Internal teams adopt the same mindset. No assumptions. No gray areas. Only measured results and clear accountability.
James Bandy, Managing Director, TriVista Digital and Technology
Design Systems for Easy Vendor Replacement
One strategy I rely on when working with vendors, and I think one that businesses should always pursue, is to design a system in a way that assumes the relationship might end.
This means when we bring on a vendor, whether it’s for proxy rotation, parsing tools, or infrastructure, we don’t just evaluate performance but also look at how easily we can unplug, replace, or rebuild around them if something goes wrong. We avoid vendor lock-in by keeping the interface modular. We isolate dependencies. And we make sure no external provider holds a critical path we can’t replicate internally.
This might sound harsh, but from my perspective, it actually creates stronger relationships. Because when vendors know you’re organized and not reliant on them emotionally or structurally, it shifts the tone of the engagement and the focus becomes delivery and reliability, not sales talk or upsells. For us, this mindset has helped us stay lean, reduce risk, and maintain control of our product even as we scale rapidly and work with a globally distributed team.
Cahyo Subroto, Founder, MrScraper
Provide Full Context to Vendors
We have worked with a range of tech vendors and data providers while building a platform that has helped over 2 million job seekers improve their resumes and land better jobs. One strategy that has consistently worked for us in managing vendors is treating them like our own internal team members from the very beginning.
We start by giving them full context. Before any work begins, we walk them through what our product does, who our users are, and why this specific project matters. We explain the outcome we’re trying to achieve and how it fits into the bigger picture. This helps them see the project not just as a task, but as part of something meaningful.
It’s a time investment upfront, but in my perspective, it builds alignment early and reduces friction later. When our vendors understand our goals and constraints, they make better decisions on their own without needing constant back-and-forth. It also reduces misunderstandings, which saves time and builds real trust between us.
So, instead of chasing updates or fixing misaligned work, we’re collaborating toward the same outcome from day one.
For me, successful vendor relationships should always start with shared understanding. The more context we give early on, the less friction we face later—and that’s what keeps the partnership productive.
Stephen Greet, CEO & co-founder, BeamJobs
Build Trust Through Transparency
Transparency from the very beginning has been especially effective when it comes to dealing with suppliers. We know what is expected in terms of deadlines, quality, and deliverables. So, there are fewer surprises down the line. By simply communicating and giving feedback along the way, there can be corrections to the course before small problems become major issues. I have found that how you treat vendors, more as partners and not just suppliers, matters a lot. It builds trust, keeps things running smoothly, and allows us to pivot quickly if our path needs to change. It has definitely helped us not only to stay on target with projects but to create better results for our clients.
Jason Hishmeh, Author | CTO | Founder | Tech Investor, Varyence
Run Shared SLA War Rooms
We run a “shared-SLA war room” with every mission-critical vendor and tie payment milestones to our uptime, not just theirs.
In radiology, a five-minute PACS outage can delay stroke treatment, so vendor failures become our failures. Early on, we discovered that standard cloud or AI inference contracts—99.9% uptime, response within 24 hours—didn’t map to the clinical stakes our hospitals face. To close that gap, we created a single incident channel in Slack, gave key vendors (cloud GPU provider, DICOM router supplier, SMS gateway) guest accounts, and piped live SLO dashboards into the feed. Every alert that pages our on-call engineer also hits the vendor in real time.
Two rules make the model stick:
1. Shared timer: The clock on any P1 incident starts when our monitoring fires, not when the vendor “verifies.”
2. Earn-back clauses: Quarterly invoices have a 10% at-risk component that scales with minutes of joint downtime. If they exceed the error budget, the next bill shrinks automatically; if they beat it, they recapture the hold-back plus a kicker.
Impact:
- 34% faster mean-time-to-resolution across third-party incidents in the first six months.
- Zero finger-pointing: Because both sides see identical logs and Grafana graphs, root cause analysis turns collaborative instead of adversarial.
- Preferred-customer perks: Vendors now surface beta features to us first, knowing rapid feedback will improve their overall product.
Why it works: Vendors crave proven, referenceable healthcare clients; we need bulletproof uptime. The shared-SLA war room turns that interdependence into a game-theory win-win: vendors earn more by keeping us live, and we avoid costly multi-sourcing complexity. If you operate in any sector where downtime kills trust—fintech, IoT, health—inviting vendors into your alert flow and linking payment to real-world performance is the fastest path to reliability and a true partnership mindset.
Andrei Blaj, Co-founder, Medicai
Maintain Personal Relationships with Vendors
Maintaining a personal relationship with your vendors before any problems arise is best. You can schedule monthly or quarterly check-in meetings to evaluate progress, discuss current challenges, and anticipate future challenges.
Making friends with your suppliers is also beneficial. When people have a sufficient level of familiarity, they provide you with the best services to help you succeed. For example, they will inform you of wonderful new products before anyone else knows, and they will be quick to solve problems because they care for your happiness.
Here’s how this benefits your company:
1. Faster Problem Solving: Your vendor friends act quickly when there is a problem, solving it immediately.
2. Cost-effective: Generally, suppliers extend their services and lower their prices for businesses they trust and work with.
3. Advance Notification: You are the first to receive information about new changes in technology and products, ensuring that you remain ahead of your competitors.
4. Less Stress: Smooth communication results in fewer crises and surprises for everyone.
5. Consistent Quality: Regular check-ups and monitoring help improve small issues before they become bigger problems, thus maintaining quality.
This approach is effective when your vendors are treated as teammates. Avoid viewing them simply as service providers. When suppliers are treated with respect, they strive to fulfill your needs. Many tech companies have benefited from this regular communication strategy and have improved inter-departmental operations and firm growth.
Farrukh Muzaffar, CMO | Co-Founder | Business strategist, Quantum Jobs USA
Diversify Supplier Base for Redundancy
The key to managing our vendors and partners well is to keep our supplier base as diverse as possible. We made a conscious decision to build relationships with at least two vendors for every important part of our tech stack when we first started our AI web scraping business.
This backup was tested earlier this year when our main natural language processing (NLP) service provider went down for an extended period. We weren’t left in the dark; instead, we were able to switch to our backup vendor with minimal disruption to our business. This redundancy has been very beneficial for security and peace of mind, even though it might not seem cost-effective on paper.
Not only do we have multiple relationships with vendors, but we’ve also created detailed contingency plans for each of them. These plans clearly outline when to implement our backup solutions by setting specific triggers and protocols. This will ensure that the transition goes smoothly even if problems arise unexpectedly. This approach is not about distrust; it’s about recognizing that even the best and most reliable partners can face unforeseen challenges.
We’ve been able to ensure the resilience and reliability of our technology infrastructure by using this strategic approach to redundancy and risk management. This has been a crucial component of our overall business success. This proactive measure has consistently paid off, giving us the confidence to handle unexpected issues and maintain the high standards our customers have come to expect.
Shuai Guan, Co-Founder & CEO, Thunderbit
Create Internal Abstraction Layers
The effective vendor management strategy for legacy technology vendors involves creating internal abstraction layers while developing external partnerships for long-term cooperation.
Multiple industries, including travel and healthcare, maintain their operations with essential legacy vendors who run outdated systems. The travel booking industry depends heavily on Global Distribution Systems (GDS), which include Sabre and Amadeus, yet their APIs maintain outdated characteristics and inflexible designs that prevent real-time customer experiences. The technical difference between outdated systems and modern customer needs leads to operational challenges that technology professionals must resolve.
Organizations use internal middleware or wrappers as a standard practice to create a buffer between their products and vendor systems. The intermediate layers perform functions which include data conversion and error management, along with performance enhancement and automatic reconnection mechanisms. The internal product gains flexibility and reliability through this design because the vendor system limitations remain confined.
Vendor management success depends on more than technical methods because it requires developing strong interpersonal connections. The organization should handle vendors through partnership-based interactions rather than obstructive approaches. Teams that dedicate resources to understand vendor roadmaps while offering structured feedback and working together during outages or updates receive faster support and stronger alignment. Shared SLAs together with regular syncs and co-testing of new features create significant progress.
The following practices help organizations connect across different systems:
- Keep written records of all system quirks because this prevents team knowledge from disappearing.
- The system should actively track vendor response times through established alert systems which monitor slow or failed responses.
- Should have backup systems that enable it to provide reduced functionality when necessary.
- Should maintain agile operations despite vendor delays because you can control the aspects of your system.
The strategic approach enables modern technology teams to accelerate their development pace while working within vendor limitations. The solution requires understanding the technical difference, then addressing it by choosing appropriate architectural elements and effective communication methods, along with sufficient patience.
Raju Dandigam, Engineering Manager
