ABC supports bill to increase competition on Fed Contracts

Real Estate | 12 Jan, 2016 |

Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) applauded the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s favorable reporting of the Government Neutrality in Contracting Act (H.R. 1671) out of committee.

The bill, introduced by Rep. Mulvaney (R-S.C.), will increase fair and open competition on federal and federally funded construction projects by preventing federal agencies from requiring contractors to sign project labor agreements as a condition of winning federal or federally assisted construction contracts.

“Project labor agreement mandates restrict competition from qualified contractors and drive up costs to taxpayers by excluding the 86.1 percent of the U.S. private construction workforce that chooses not to belong to a labor union from working on these projects unless they join a union or pay union dues and fees,” said Ben Brubeck, ABC director of Labor and Federal Procurement. “By removing federal agencies’ ability to require these discriminatory agreements, Rep. Mulvaney’s commonsense legislation will increase competition on taxpayer-funded construction projects and ensure that taxpayers get the best possible construction at the greatest value. Today’s action by the committee follows the momentum built at the state and local level to eliminate these crony contracting schemes.”

Associated Builders and Contractors sent a letter to members of the committee ahead of today’s markup and has long opposed project labor agreement mandates as discriminatory and anti-competitive backroom deals that increase costs to taxpayers.

Studies indicate government-mandated project labor agreements increase the cost of construction projects in numerous markets between 12 and 18 percent compared to similar none project labor agreement projects.

When mandated by a government agency on a taxpayer-funded project, a project labor agreement typically ensures construction contracts are awarded only to companies that agree to recognize unions as the representatives of their employees on that job, use the union hiring hall to obtain workers at the expense of existing qualified employees, obtain apprentices through union apprenticeship programs, follow inefficient union work rules, pay into union benefit and multi-employer pension plans and force workers to pay union dues and/or join a union as a condition of employment.

In 2009, President Barack Obama issued Executive Order 13502, which strongly encourages the use of government-mandated project labor agreements on federal and federally funded construction projects.

In response, 20 states have enacted legislation or executive orders restricting project labor agreement requirements and preferences on state and local projects since 2011.

In 2015 three states took action to guarantee free and open competition on taxpayer-funded construction projects. West Virginia banned project labor agreement mandates in March when Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin became the first Democratic governor to sign a bill prohibiting project labor agreement mandates. Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson signed into law a bipartisan bill prohibiting project labor agreement mandates that passed both the State Senate and House of Representatives in unanimous votes in March.

And Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval signed legislation to make Nevada the 23rd state to restrict project labor agreement mandates on state and state-assisted projects in some capacity in June. However, Maine’s 2011 law sunset in October 2015, dropping the number of states back to 22.

In addition, on March 27, 2015, the U.S. Senate passed Amendment 665, offered by Sen. Flake (R-Ariz.) to the Senate’s budget resolution (S. Con. Res. 11), which expresses the sense of the Senate that construction contracts should be awarded without discrimination based on contractors’ agreements with labor organizations. The House passed the budget conference report, which also included this anti-project labor agreement language, 226-197, on April 30.

Sen. Vitter (R-La.) has introduced companion legislation, S. 71, which has been referred to the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee and awaits further action.

 

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons